Changes to Roblox Plus Private Server Limits

This topic was automatically opened after 10 minutes.

So as far as i know, some people created a bot/service with roblox plus to create free private servers for everybody which may or may not have caused this change

If this reduces the bot farms. Then this is a fair update

This is why we can’t have nice things. But, something had to be done. I’m surprised there wasn’t a more reasonable limit (like 10 or something less) to these free “paid” private servers earlier.

Can Roblox take that kind of service down or ban the account(s) responsible if it’s abusing the Roblox Plus/private server system? Since this behavior is clearly exploiting the system and harming creator revenue, it seems like targeted enforcement against the abusers would be more appropriate than r

That would demand an overwhelming amount of resources, i think this is a more reasonable and straight-forward change, since i don’t think most people were making use of multiple private servers. ( Though to be fair i believe they could have at least capped it off to something higher than 1 )

FountainHand: However, we found that a small number of Plus members were creating thousands of free paid private servers per game with broad access this is what we call a “perverse incentive” a little sad because i did like giving private server links to my friends but also what did you expect to ha

image 978×262 28.3 KB This is terrible, I have 4 Private Servers for my game, either make it 5 max per game or let Developers create Private servers for free on their own games @FountainHand Feature request Let Developers create Private Servers for free for their own Games Purchasing Bugs With this

People will complain obviously (with every roblox update) but I see this as a understandable update. It reduces botting farms some players do with tons of private servers, and other things, its obviously bad for people who had many private servers and were using them with good intention, but this up

It allows developers to create free private servers in their own games It seemed crazy to me that it wasn’t there. It doesn’t make sense that a developer can’t have a free private server for their own game, regardless of Plus.

Yeah i understand why this update happens but please fix the subscriptions page??? image 1044×503 45.6 KB Private Servers not Showing up in subscriptions Roblox Application and Website Bugs A new Update was leaked for September 21 related to private servers. Source: [image] I’m afraid that I might h

Honestly 1 VIP server is enough for most games, I’m kinda surprised they didn’t just start with that

Maybe im being pedantic, but this feels a bit scummy. If i remember correctly, one of the main selling points for Plus was unlimited private servers. Not just one! And now, a month or two later, its being removed? I know you keep one, but at least raise the limit to 5 to help keep the original promi

i mean you coulda just done 3 P-S’s per game i guess, but one will stop bot farming soooo yeah but who , in their right minds , uses nonillions of private servers per game tho??? wayy too much bots

It’s almost like developers knew this was going to happen and tried to warn you in the original thread. Better late than never I guess.

So from unlimited private servers to just one? That seems like an overreaction. Like others have said, just give a reasonable limit so if people have Plus they can still have free private servers in the games they play.

Soundmoji: So as far as i know, some people created a bot/service with roblox plus to create free private servers for everybody which may or may not have caused this change Hexi: If this reduces the bot farms. Then this is a fair update Wow! If only developers were against this change from the begin

Not sure why this is getting criticized! There’s very rare cases where you need more than one private server for a game. This just helps prevents botting. Good update.

This is how I learn developers can’t make their own private servers for free. That’s insane to me and seems like it HAS to just be an oversight, right??